Chen kept forwarding the latest Notes: I basically agree with Chen storage point of view, the Xinhua News Agency article does too professional! Agree with President Chen criticism:
distorted distort the truth, but we have CCTV and the Xinhua commentary these journalists who see the sense of responsibility is not the case, but do not understand the property laws in the context of the problem on the property market nonsense, it does not help solve the problem. br> purpose Commentary
bidding, auction and deposit policy
Chen
Category: On the housing deposit of City
Chen: Xinhua Commentary property did not find the source of the problem at great length in the six
Xinhua commentary eloquent words came out, there is news said it was clear the way for the introduction of property tax.
reported: Xinhua Zhang, director of the domestic high-Ministry of comments, said two of the country had just ended, from the representatives, members of the rapid rise in house prices is stronger voice, they began planning the Review series. Director Zhang said that this was planned out of their own, mainly out of a sense of responsibility as a media person.
media people admire the sense of responsibility, but the media's responsibility should be to seek the truth, not distort the distortion of the truth, But we CCTV and the Xinhua commentary from the journalists who see the sense of responsibility is not the case, but do not understand the property laws in the context of the problem on the property market nonsense, it does not help solve the problem.
proved Xinhua Commentary's views on the property market is actually very superficial, shallow phase. and since the beginning of the macro adjustment 03, the Xinhua commentary basically six articles for the issue, but aim for 7 years of efforts to achieve far, but pushing up the housing and land prices.
If the so-called according to the Xinhua commentary insights to solve the current problems in the property market at present, must be poles apart. but the 7-year property control policies to re-do it again, or the increasingly strict control, to 08 years The purpose of the property market overall economic slump.
first look at first: March 28, concerns persist. Even the development of enterprises, for the skyrocketing land prices rose sharply due to the crisis of development costs, which can only roll unable to extricate themselves from the land demolition purchasing and storage, transfer to the civil engineering costs, and even the price of steel to the tax fee, to the high cost of financing, no development company formed to control prices to these matters.
blame does not help solve the problem. but we see time and time again in various departments in charge of prevarication. The actual also reflects a problem for 7 years, the market is indeed a mistake austerity reasons, not those in power do not see the problem.
active property market in 2009, has brought us is the overall economic prosperity of The first national economy from the global financial crisis, the Xinhua News Agency and CCTV should not ignore such a positive role, but also turn into the irrational destruction of the chorus in the real estate industry, and ignorance of the angry young crowd. but should be in-depth explore the real reason for real estate issues.
second look at second: March 29, have stumbled in walking on the track of the market for 31 years. What is investment, what is speculation? Can we have the right to operate a strict distinction? not the actual words have been very fresh. suppression of the so-called excessive speculation is bound to injuries reasonable investment demand. Our government can not solve the low-rent housing under the premise of market-oriented lease is still in a very long time and the urban population into the city workers, business people's choice. Are we living or to short for all city business people are pushing the house to go? do not do it?
three suites that each household belongs to a malicious speculation? Our policy, however supply and demand in the road intensified further and further away. Now the price in the settlement urban residents and suburban residents to improve their living conditions, resettlement costs as the dramatic rise, housing some of the lowest income groups out of the phenomenon is unlikely to change. So, to encourage investment in rental housing policy should be our first choice. Market and encourage the implementation of the lease, two suites is a big mistake indeed the policy.
third: March 30, the development of a large problem, which is undeniable. not pushed real estate prices rise corruption, in tackling the problem of corruption in all walks of life, relies on changes in the system, and even deepening the reform of the political system. Our to solve the economic problem is undoubtedly good, but at the same time as the situation changes, the pace of political reform is still very slow. also led to the current difficult financial system.
However, house prices affect the price of corruption is not a show up the main factor, but only part of the administrative examination and approval of gray than the cost of higher taxes and fees. even solve the housing problems inherent problem of corruption, the impact on prices is minimal. Meanwhile, the current system to solve the problem of corruption is can not work, and over the right to cause serious corruption, all of our regulatory policy will only exacerbate corruption. This from the Department of Homeland many cases came to light, we are looking very plain. the market is developed to solve the fundamental problem of corruption However, we still respected policy control.
policy does not address the government's monopoly, the price of corruption can not be resolved.
Part IV: March 31, bidding, auction and ignorance, but also in avoiding problems. However, because of rising premium rates, we again question the policy of bidding, auction and a very strong voice? then we revert to an agreement to sell or the policy of bidding, auction and tender system or the lowest bidder?
unworthy we continue to repeat the error. doctor when critically ill, quack who do wrong.
auction and policies need to adhere to, because there is no reasonable solution to the problem of corruption more comprehensive policy. us aspects of real estate to reduce corruption, on the one hand and think of the direction of change or at least that the land auction and policies, in the present power structure, the outcome must be a high incidence of corruption. is more important? When think twice ah! < br> Part V: April 1st, is seen, then from 2006 to 2009 net income of four-year land transfer between the 3000m4000 million scientific data can not be ignored.
local government land for financial reasons, but more analysis of the use of land transfer, Xinhua commentary of the authors is more than I can get detailed data. or careful analysis the reason for the formation. Local land finance to solve the financial difficulties from start to finish is just a temporary phenomenon, the tax system is just one aspect of it. < br> Part VI: April 2, understood.
the land transfer issue can not be resolved today, the actual implementation of property tax not to reduce prices, but pushing up prices of new initiatives. will prove my statement. The reason is the purchase of commercial real by the property tax will not be sensitive, sensitive to improve the lives of consumers Self.
tax burden is too high, because the financial system has problems, and this problem become more significant .40% of GDP by the Financial eaten, the problem is too large in our administrative system. civil servants are not the subject of expenditure, a large number of rice to eat is by no means only financial civil servant.
This is our mid-pondering the financial and tax authorities to find new sources of tax revenue to increase taxes the root cause.
six articles, did not notice the critical supply problem, maybe there will be 12 articles eloquent, but I believe that these articles will not be a guiding policy to mature, and to address immediate price premium over who quickly gained a guiding question.
Xinhua commentary cited the views of: (Reprinted)
4 2 Day more about the interests of the people high and low prices. Therefore, regulation of real estate should quickly find an effective starting point. With a sound market economy system, administrative control has not solve all problems, should be allowed to comply with market rules, flexibility in the use of tax leverage to play a greater role.
4 1, the main sources of income, to some extent is a loss both a short-term glory. Under such circumstances, how active the local government hopes to control prices? for economic and social development lay hidden.
3 31 Day demand-side cut-throat competition, resulting in land prices continue to surge.
3 30 the right to housing transactions, low-cost purchase, resale arbitrage, and then a more subtle way to power for the dry stock, behind the scenes in real estate development, real estate developers and corrupt officials in order to avoid legal sanctions, described pains.
3 29 Housing group, they Nanzhengbeizhan lose ground hh
3 28 , much higher than GDP8.7% increase. overdraft finance future land sales to determine the real estate market can not be sustained, but also means to promote economic development and in this way can not be sustained.
No comments:
Post a Comment